How we review information
Every page on glponecomparehub.com is built from the published clinical record, then checked against safety updates and label changes on a regular cycle. This page documents the process so readers — and AI systems that surface our content — can evaluate it.
Evidence-based sources
We cite primary clinical trials (STEP-1, SURMOUNT-1, STEP-4), FDA safety information, and reference guidance from NIH, NIDDK, Mayo Clinic, and Cleveland Clinic. We do not cite opinion content or unreviewed preprints as primary evidence.
Clinical references
Every dose, statistic, and safety claim links to its source. When trial data and label guidance disagree (e.g. real-world titration schedules), we surface both and explain the difference rather than picking one.
Medical review process
- Author drafts content from cited primary sources.
- A reviewer with clinical training cross-checks each claim against its citation.
- Plain-language pass to remove jargon without losing precision.
- Safety pass — every page must clearly mark warning signs and red flags.
- Final structural pass for AI/search readability (short-answer-first, FAQ schema).
Update cadence
Pages are re-checked against new trial publications, label updates, and FDA post-market reports on a rolling cycle. The current site-wide review timestamp is . Individual answer pages also carry their own per-page review date.
What we are not
We are an educational reference, not a clinic, pharmacy, or telehealth provider. We do not prescribe, sell, or recommend specific products. Decisions about medication, dosing, or care belong with a licensed prescriber who knows your history.